Business-backed group says climate bill could expand immigration
A business-backed group wants to add an immigration boost amendment to Democrats’ draft “global warming” tax-and-spend package.
The Senate immigration extension request comes from the supported by business Niskanen Center. “These are pro-family reforms that will reunite millions of families separated by immigration restrictions and bring significant economic benefits and revenue — potentially more than $4 trillion in GDP over 10 years,” said Kristie De Peña, policy advocate at center on Monday.
ONE tweet from the Niskanen group suggested that five million people could get green cards from the climate bill.
That flood would equal roughly four years of legal immigration and send Wall Street into a tailspin by driving down wages, raising rents and boosting consumer sales. Niskanen receives funding from Silicon Valley foundations, George Soros and other progressive groups.
But Democratic lawmakers are wary of the push because they fear the immigration amendments could derail the massive climate and tax bill in the evenly divided Senate.
Joe Biden’s pro-immigration allies are pushing him to maximize immigration to the United States, despite deep public opposition to cheap labor immigration. https://t.co/0P3Uzj6k5N
— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) December 29, 2020
“This is not [legislative] vehicle” for immigration, said Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL). a pro-immigration website. “We want to get over it this week and stay until it is –. opening the amendment process [to include immigration] it makes it very difficult,” said Durbin, who is the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate.
The so-called “vehicle” is the climate change bill moving through the Senate through the fast-track reconciliation process.
That process includes a so-called “vote-a-rama” in which senators are expected to offer several amendments to the spending package. Amendments are decided by majority vote, so if even a few Democrats support a GOP-backed amendment, it gets added to the Democrats’ climate bill.
The GOP is likely to oppose such expansions of Democratic immigration because a flood of new immigrants would rapidly increase Democratic voter turnout by 2030.
But business-backed demands for more immigration may also be aimed at thwarting the GOP amendments.
For example, Sen. James Lankford (R-OK) he said Bloomberg on Tuesday that it has amendments “in the queue” for debate. The amendment may extend Title 42’s legal barrier to the border.
“Republicans appear likely to try to force votes on thorny issues like immigration and border security that could divide Democrats and possibly jeopardize the overall bill,” RollCall.com mentionted on August 2. “You can expect a lot of challenging votes,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) told the magazine.
A growing percentage of Americans want immigration levels to be reduced, according to a new poll. https://t.co/NgW9WUvLw9
— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) May 23, 2022
The proposed Title 42 expansion is hotly contested by Democrats, even though border chief Joe Biden allows most immigrants to either opt out of the Title 42 barrier or sneak across the border with the help of coyotes.
Both parties are using the reconciliation debate to position themselves as opponents of illegal immigration ahead of the November election, said Jon Feere, a former border patrol official who now works with the Center for Immigration Studies.
For example, the flagship bipartisan bill to extend the Title 42 amendment doesn’t force Biden’s border chief to close any of the loopholes he’s created, he told Breitbart News.
“Unfortunately, there are many weak Republicans who are also okay with political messaging that is ineffective [in stopping migration]Feere said.
“If Republicans fought harder, they would add amendments that require the hiring of thousands of new ICE officers and eliminate all [President Joe Biden’s] policies to encourage illegal immigration,” he added.
Since at least 1990, the DC foundation has drawn tens of millions of legal and illegal immigrants—as well as temporary visa workers—from poor countries to serve as workers, managers, consumers, and tenants for various investors in the U.S. and Managing Directors.
This federal economic policy of Mining Immigration has distorted the free market in the United States by inflating the labor supply to the benefit of employers. Inflationary policy makes it harder for ordinary Americans to get married, advance their careers, or raise families or buy homes.
Mining migration has also slowed innovation and shrunk American productivity, in part because it allows employers to boost stock prices by using cheap labor instead of productivity-enhancing technology.
Immigration undermines workers’ rights in the workplace and widens the regional wealth gap between major Democratic coastal states and the Republican heartland and southern states. The flood of cheap labor tilts the economy toward low-productivity jobs and has driven at least ten million American men out of the workforce.
An economy based on mining immigration also drains Americans of political influence among elites, alienates young people, and radicalizes America’s democratic civic culture because it allows wealthy elites to ignore desperate Americans in bottom of society.
The economic policy is supported by progressives who wish to transform the US from a society governed by European civic culture into a progressive empire of competing, resentful identity groups. “We’re trying to become the world’s first multiracial, multiethnic superpower,” said Rohit Khanna (D-CA). he said The New York Times in March 2022. “It will be an extraordinary achievement … we will finally triumph,” he boasted.
Business-backed immigration advocates hide this economic mining immigration policy behind a wide variety of kind explanations and theater border security programs. For example, progressives claim that the US is a “nation of immigrants,” that immigration is good for immigrants, and that the state must be renewed by replacing populations.
Polls show the public wants to welcome some immigration – but also show deep and widespread public opposition to labor migration and an influx of temporary contracts workers in jobs sought by new US graduates.
Opposition is growing, anti-establishment, multi-racial, interracial, non-racial, class-based, bi-partisan, reasonablepersistent and recognizes the solidarity that American citizens owe to one another.